Upgrade tips¶
Description
Advanced tips for upgrading Plone.
General Tips¶
This guide contains some tips for Plone upgrades. For more Information, see also the Official Plone upgrade guide
Recommended set-up¶
- Test upgrade on your local development computer first.
- Create two buildouts. One for the old Plone version (your existing buildout) and one for new version.
- Prepare the migration in old buildout. After all preparations are done, copy Data.fs to new buildout and run plone_migration tool there.
Clear catalog¶
Before moving the Data.fs to new version, clear all site portal_catalog information.
Fix persistent utilities¶
You might need to clean up some leftovers from uninstalled add-ons which have not performed a clean uninstall.
Use this utility:
Note
Perform this against old buildout
Content Upgrades¶
For content migrations, Products.contentmigration can help you. Documentation on how to use it can be found on plone.org.
Migration from non-folderish to folderish Archetypes based content types¶
Non-folderish content types are missing some BTree
attributes, which folderish content types have (See
Products.BtreeFolder2.BTreeFolder2Base._initBtrees
).
plone.app.folder provides an upgrade view to migrate
pre-plone.app.folder (or non-folderish) types to the new
BTree based implementation (defined in:
plone.app.folder.migration.BTreeMigrationView
).
To upgrade your non-folderish content types to folderish
ones, just call
@@migrate-btrees
on your Plone site root, and you're done.
This applies to Archetypes based content types.
Upgrading theme¶
Make sure that your site them works on Plone 4. Official upgrade guide has tips how the theme codebase should be upgraded.
Theme fixing and portal_skins¶
Your theme might be messed up after upgrade.
Try playing around setting in portal_skins Properties tab. You can enable, disable and reorder skins layer applied in the theme.
Upgrade may change the default theme and you might want to restore custom theme in portal_skins.
Upgrade tips for plone.app.discussion¶
Enabling plone.app.discussion after Plone 4.1 upgrade¶
After migration from an earlier version of Plone, you
will may notice that you do not have a
Discussion control panel for
plone.app.discussion
, the new commenting infrastructure which now ships as
part of new Plone installs beyond version 4.1. If a
check of your Site Setup page reveals that you
do not have the Discussion control panel,
implement the following.
Install plone.app.discussion manually¶
-
Log into your Plone site as a user with Manager access
-
Browse to the following URL to manually install
plone.app.discussion
:http://<your-plone-url>:<port>/<plone-instance>/portal_setup/manage_importSteps
-
In the Select Profile or Snapshot drop-down menu, select
Plone Discussions
. -
Click the
Import all steps
button at the bottom of the page. -
Confirm that Discussion is now present as a control panel in your Site Setup
Migrate existing comments¶
Follow the instructions regarding How to migrate comments to plone.app.discussion to migrate existing Plone comments.
Fixing Creator details on existing comments¶
You may notice that some of your site's comments have
the user's ID as their Creator property. At time of
writing (for
plone.app.discussion==2.0.10
), the Creator field should refer to the user's full
name and not their user ID. You'll likely notice that a
number of other fields, including
author_username
,
author_name
and
author_email
are not present on some of your migrated comments.
Reasons why comments get migrated but unsuccessfully are
being investigated.
This may change for future versions of
plone.app.discussion
. For now, though, having the user ID left as the
Creator is less than helpful and means aspects like the
username, name, and email not present affect usability
of comments.
If a site has many comments with this issue, it is possible to step through all of them and correct them. Using a script like the following will process each of the affected comments accordingly:
from Products.CMFPlone.utils import getToolByName
from zope.app.component import hooks
context = hooks.getSite()
catalog = getToolByName(context, 'portal_catalog')
mtool = getToolByName(context, 'portal_membership')
brains = catalog.searchResults(object_provides='plone.app.discussion.interfaces.IComment')
for brain in brains:
member = mtool.getMemberById(brain.Creator)
comment = brain.getObject()
if member and not comment.author_username and not comment.author_name and not comment.author_email:
fullname = member.getProperty('fullname')
email = member.getProperty('email')
if fullname and email:
comment.author_username = brain.Creator #our borked user ID
comment.creator = fullname
comment.author_name = fullname
comment.author_email = email
comment.reindexObject()
print 'Fixed and reindexed %s' % comment
else:
print 'Could not find properties for author of %s' % comment
This can be run anywhere an Acquisition
context
object is available, such as running your Zope instance
in
debug
mode, an ipython prompt, or some other function on the
filesystem. The
getSite()
function call can (and may need to) be replaced with
some other pre-existing context object if that is more
suitable.
Keep in mind that this script was successfully used in a
situation where no possible collisions existed between
correctly-migrated comments Creators' full names and
user IDs (the code looks up the Creator in the hope of
finding a valid Plone member). So, if you had a
situation where you had some correctly migrated comments
written by a user with ID
david
and full name of
Administrator
, and also had a user with the ID of
Administrator
, then this script may not be suitable. In the test
situation, the three attributes of
author_username
,
author_name
, and
author_email
were observed as all being
None
, so in checking for this too, this may avoid problems.
Test the code first with something like a
print
statement to ensure all comments will get modified
correctly.